Home Our Team Case Evaluation Contact Us
Recent Posts
Categories
Archives
Phoenix Divorce
Family Law
Divorce Info
Contested / Uncontested Divorce
Collaborative Law
Child Custody
Relocations
Child Support
Post Decree Modification
Premarital & Postmarital Agreements
Grandparent Rights
Adoption
Military Divorce
Older Woman in Divorce
Business Property Settlements
Spousal Support
Domestic Violence
Orders of Protection
Juvenile Law
Paternity
Mediation
Divorce College
Divorce Resources
Family Law Blog
Arbitration & Mediation Center

Phoenix Law Office, Tel: (602) 644-2328

Mesa Law Office, Tel: (480) 985-4000

Safford Law Office, Tel: (928) 348-9898

Our Arizona law firm proudly serves the following areas:

Phoenix, Mesa, Scottsdale, Glendale, Chandler, Tempe, Peoria, Sun City, Gilbert, Surprise, Paradise Valley, Avondale, Queen Creek, Fountain Hills, Carefree, and other cities in the counties of: Maricopa, Yavapai, Coconino, Navajo, Gila, Graham & Pinal.

« Child Support Issues | Main
  Perseverance & Adjustments

I learned a big lesson this last week or so.  A few months ago, my client and I went to a temporary orders hearing where the other side was asking for all sorts of money and trying to raise some serious doubts about what my client's real earnings - and therefore, his real ability to pay her huge requests - was.  We didn't do horribly at the temporary orders hearing, but we didn't do very well either, and the judge noted that he had a lot of skepticism about what my client's true income was.

 

Fast forward a few months, and we were at the trial.  Our whole strategy was getting around this "skepticism" that the judge had about my client's income.  With the extra time that we had at trial (compared to what we had at the temporary orders hearing), we were able to call my client's boss, who spoke very clearly and very convincingly about what my client was actually making.  With the additional time, my client was also able to give very specific testimony about his work, his accounts (including names and dates), and his actual income.  I was also able to get his wife to admit - she actually admitted this! - that she really didn't know what his job duties were, and his testimony on the subject would be a lot more reliable than her conjecture.  At the close of the trial, the judge went out of his way to tell us that the skepticism he had about my client's income was now gone.

 

The moral of the story?  I think there are two of them.  First, don't give up.  We have the ability in family law cases to resolve concerns and straighten things out, as long as the truth is there, and it really supports our position.  Second, adjustments.  Court proceedings are a lot like sports, where making half-time adjustments, so to speak, is extremely important.  It's an ongoing battle, and whoever can make the appropriate adjustments many times will end up with the upper hand and win.  Sure, it depends on the actual facts of the case, and no lawyer can change facts (and an honest lawyer won't even try to change to facts).  But it is very nice to stick with something, make those adjustments and come out on top.

Categories: Family Law

Posted By Mark Shields on May 01, 2010 09:00 am | Permalink 
Litigation, Dispute Resolution & Appeals
Wrongful Death
Employment Law
Divorce Law
Custody
Domestic Violence
Contact Us





IN AN EFFORT TO CUT DOWN ON SPAM, WE ASK THAT YOU ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTION: WHAT IS 5 PLUS 2?


Blog
Contact Us


Follow Gillespie, Shields & Durrant on Facebook Follow Gillespie, Shields & Durrant on Twitter
Follow Gillespie, Shields & Durrant on LinkedIn Coming Soon
Copyright © 2010 The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this or associated pages, documents, comments, answers, emails, or other communications should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.